Student panel: What did you do last summer? Thursday October 1 @ 4pm in Olin 268

Title:  What did you do last summer?

Abstract:   There are many exciting summer opportunities for students in the mathematical sciences! These range from internships in financial companies to research experiences at other universities to leadership development programs. In this week’s colloquium, a panel of your peers will tell you their experiences. What did they enjoy about their experiences? When did they apply? There will also be ample time for questions and answers. These varied opportunities, as well as being terrific fun, are also immensely valuable as you begin to think about your careers after Bucknell.

DVP Talk: Takunari Miyazakie, October 1 @ 4 pm in Olin 372

tm0

Title: Computing canonical forms of graphs

Abstract: Determining the computational complexity of the problem of finding canonical representatives of graphs is a long-standing unresolved question.  This question is of fundamental interest in the theory of computing because of its close relationship with graph-isomorphism testing.

While the problem may be difficult in general, group-theoretic methods have enabled polynomial-time solutions for important classes of graphs, including graphs of bounded valence.  In practice, however, variants of backtrack search to find lexicographic leaders have long been accepted as quite effective; for example, the system nauty is the leader in this category.

In this talk, I will discuss theoretical limitations of the lexicographic-leader approach to finding canonical forms.  It turns out that this approach leads to NP-complete problems, even for very restricted classes of graphs for which there are simple polynomial-time solutions by group-theoretic methods.

DVP talk: James Wilson, September 29th 4pm in Olin 372

coffee

Title: Tying different knots: problems with isomorphism in algebra

Abstract: In 1905 Max Dehn proved if you tie a knot by “over-under” you never end up with the same knot as when you tie it “under-over”.  His proof — still the only proof — hinged on a very delicate and typically difficult problem of computing isomorphisms in algebra.  By the 1950’s Adian and Rabin had proved the approach in general is undecidable — no computer can do it.

Yet, the uses for isomorphism are too profound to give up after undecidability. The decades that followed saw the founders of computational algebra – Cannon, Neubuser, and Sims – make substantial inroads on the problem.  Theoretical Computer Scientists Miller, Lipton-Zalcstein, and Tarjan framed the problem in the emerging complexity zoo with the curious realization that group isomorphism is in one form easier than graph isomorphism and in another form harder.

Today isomorphism in algebra is experiencing a renaissance.  Long-standing “hard cases” are crumbling with the discovery of new linear perspectives.  Old practical algorithms are being combined with new data structures to result in exponential improvements.  And the approaches grow by the month.  The vanguard of this exciting new wave are researchers at  Aachen, Auckland, Bucknell, Chicago, Colorado State, London, Santa Fe, and Sydney.

We will report on what we know, what we want to know, and give the reasons for all the recent attention. The talk will not assume a technical proficiency in mathematics or computation.

Student Talk Series: Dr. John MacCarthy, Systems Engineering Education Program University of Maryland, College Park, Thursday, September 17th in Olin 268 @ noon

maccarthy

Title: The Use of Markov State Models in Reliability, Availability, and Maintainability (RAM) Analysis

Abstract: Three of the most important attributes of a system are its availability, reliability, and maintainability. A large portion of a typical system’s life cycle cost is driven by its reliability and maintainability. Reliability, Availability, and Maintainability (RAM) analyses are performed as a part of the development of almost all large-scale systems. Conceptually, there is a simple algebraic relationship between these three parameters that may be derived from a simple Markov state model. For complex systems, the models can become quite challenging. This seminar will provide 1) a discussion of why availability, reliability, and maintainability are important characteristics of a system; 2) definitions for each characteristic and their associated metrics; 3) an example of a simple system and how a simple Markov state model may be developed and used to derive the algebraic expression for the relationship between the three metrics; 4) an example of how the expression may be used to perform trade studies and sensitivity studies; and 5) a discussion of the simple analytical framework may be extended to address more complex systems.

Student Talk Series: Kelly Bickel, Bucknell University, Thursday, September 3rd in Olin 268 @ noon

KellyBickel_400x385

Title: Geometry, Meet Origami

Abstract: In this talk, we will go back in time to the ancient Greeks (or at least your high school geometry class) and take a good look at what we can draw with a compass and straight-edge. The answer is “Not Much!,” at least when compared to what a little paper folding will get us. Come prepared to trisect some angles, double some cubes, and scoff at the circle squarers.

Student Talk Series: Carl D. Garthwaite, Vencore Inc., April 16th in Olin 268 @ noon

Title: So You Think Your Errors Are Random…

Abstract:

In the development of radio frequency systems for digital communications, great attention is given to achieving low error rate performance.

Oversimplification of assumptions, however, such as treating bit errors as independent, identically distributed (iid) events may lead to seriously flawed

projections of performance.  An examination of the statistical behavior of error sequence correlation shows how reasonable observation schemes supported by

computer-based models can yield useful insight into likely system performance.

Distinguished Visiting Professor Talk Series: Constanze Liaw, Baylor University, April 14th @4pm in Olin 372

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

Title: Perspectives on Rank 1 Perturbations

Abstract: 

The central question in perturbation theory is as follows. Let A and B be linear transformations; think of (NxN)-matrices or differential operators.

we know the eigenvalues of A and have partial information about B. What can we say about the eigenvalues of A+B?

The perturbation is said to be of rank 1, if we assume that B is a vector projection. This seemingly simple example (a) exhibits a surprisingly rich theory with connections

to harmonic analysis and operator theory; and (b) arises naturally in mathematical physics via a change of boundary conditions of a second order differential operator.

Distinguished Visiting Professor Talk Series: Constanze Liaw, Baylor University, April 16th @4pm in Olin 372

Title: Finding Cyclic Vectors

Abstract:  In perturbation theory, the cyclicity (i.e. completeness of the forward orbit for some vector) of an operator is often a natural assumption

in the hypothesis of many results. We discuss two sets of results. (a) We consider rank one perturbations and some applications concerning the

locations where functions of the Payley-Wiener class are allowed to have zeros. (b) We study so-called Anderson-type Hamiltonians (a

generalization of random Schroedinger operators) and state that under mild conditions, every non-zero vector is cyclic almost surely. This result is

related to the long-standing problem of Anderson localization.